
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1050

FirePro W7100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W7100 is positioned at rank #184 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W7100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050.
| Insight | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $114), it costs 61% less, resulting in a 151.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+151.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($114) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 1050

FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

GeForce GTX 1050
The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the GeForce GTX 1050 reaches 5,033 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,065 | 5,033 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+180% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.297 TFLOPS+77% | 1.862 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+87% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 has 2 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7100) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050) — the GeForce GTX 1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1050's 60W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 65 C.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 60W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 65 C-32% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8 | 83.9+148% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7100 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $114, while the GeForce GTX 1050 launched at $110 and now averages $45. The GeForce GTX 1050 costs 60.5% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (FirePro W7100) vs 111.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 151.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $110-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $114 | $45-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | 111.8+152% |
| Codename | Tonga | GP107 |
| Release | August 12 2014 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #406 | #443 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















