FirePro W7100
VS
Radeon R9 M395X

FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M395X

FirePro W7100

2014Core: 920 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

2015Core: 723 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W7100 is positioned at rank 184 and the Radeon R9 M395X is on rank 391, so the FirePro W7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100

#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
99%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
97%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
96%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
95%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
92%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
88%
#169
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2330%
#184
FirePro W7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $114
100%
#185
P106-090
MSRP: $389|Avg: $30
100%
#186
Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
99%
#188
Tesla M6
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84
98%
#190
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
97%
#191
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
97%
#193
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
96%
#196
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
92%
#197
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395X

#381
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1273%
#383
1154%
#384
1151%
#388
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1046%
#389
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1039%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
100%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
99%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
99%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
97%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
94%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
94%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#406
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M395X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro W7100Radeon R9 M395X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W7100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $114 (vs $150), it costs 24% less, resulting in a 30.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W7100Radeon R9 M395X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+30.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($114)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M395X

AMD

FirePro W7100

The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).

FeatureFirePro W7100Radeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score
5,065
5,120+1%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792
2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.297 TFLOPS+11%
2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112
128+14%
L1 Cache
448 KB
512 KB+14%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7100Radeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X has 4 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureFirePro W7100Radeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro W7100Radeon R9 M395X
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
33.8
68.3+102%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W7100 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $114, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 and now averages $150. The FirePro W7100 costs 24% less ($36 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (FirePro W7100) vs 34.1 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the FirePro W7100 offers 30.2% better value. The Radeon R9 M395X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W7100Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP
$799
$600-25%
Avg Price (30d)
$114-24%
$150
Performance per Dollar
44.4+30%
34.1
Codename
Tonga
Amethyst
Release
August 12 2014
May 5 2015
Ranking
#406
#438