
FirePro W7100

Radeon R9 M395X
FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M395X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7100
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.2% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,065 | 5,120+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.297 TFLOPS+11% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X carries 4 GB. FirePro W7100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro W7100 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8 | 68.3+102% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7100 came in at $799, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395X was 24.9% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (FirePro W7100) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Radeon R9 M395X offers 34.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395X (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $600-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 8.5+35% |
| Codename | Tonga | Amethyst |
| Release | August 12 2014 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #406 | #438 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















