GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M395X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395X
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon R9 M395X?
The battle between the high-end GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and the legacy mobile flagship Radeon R9 M395X illustrate the absolute widest gap in PC graphics. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly 5000% more raw compute muscle, moving from a chip that struggled with 1080p in 2015 to a world-class monster that masters uncompromised 4K Ultra gaming with ease.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features a massive 16GB of dedicated fast memory and specialized hardware for Path Tracing and DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The Radeon R9 M395X is a legacy mobile solution and lacks the core count or bandwidth to handle modern software with any stability. Moving from any notebook with legacy graphics to a 40-series Ti SUPER powered tower is a transformative upgrade, providing the speed and visual depth needed for the most demanding digital environments in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and detail that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The Radeon R9 M395X is now strictly piece of hardware history on legacy notebooks. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M395X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 516.8% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395X.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+516.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-516.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 56.8% better value per dollar than the Radeon R9 M395X.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+56.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 5,120 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 516.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+517% | 5,120 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+275% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+1254% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M395X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M395X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) — a 215% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M395X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+215% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 116.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 75W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+62% | 68.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M395X costs 74.6% less ($440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 34.1 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 56.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $600-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $150-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+57% | 34.1 |
| Codename | AD104 | Amethyst |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #11 | #438 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon R9 M395X
