FirePro W7100
VS
FirePro S9000

FirePro W7100 vs FirePro S9000

FirePro W7100

2014Core: 920 MHz
VS

FirePro S9000

2012Core: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W7100 is positioned at rank 184 and the FirePro S9000 is on rank 291, so the FirePro W7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100

#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
99%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
97%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
96%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
95%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
92%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
88%
#169
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2330%
#184
FirePro W7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $114
100%
#185
P106-090
MSRP: $389|Avg: $30
100%
#186
Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
99%
#188
Tesla M6
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84
98%
#190
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
97%
#191
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
97%
#193
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
96%
#196
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
92%
#197
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000

#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
99%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
99%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
97%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
96%
#276
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7313%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
100%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
98%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
98%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
97%
#300
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
96%
#301
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
96%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
94%
#303
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
90%
#304
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
87%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
86%
#306
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W7100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro S9000.

InsightFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W7100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $114 (vs $156), it costs 27% less, resulting in a 37% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+37%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($114)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($156)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7100 and FirePro S9000

AMD

FirePro W7100

The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

AMD

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the FirePro S9000 reaches 5,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro S9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9000). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000).

FeatureFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
G3D Mark Score
5,065
5,059
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.297 TFLOPS+2%
3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112
112
L1 Cache
448 KB
448 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9000 has 4 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W7100) vs 768 KB (FirePro S9000) — the FirePro S9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 (FirePro S9000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000).

FeatureFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
Encoder
VCE 3.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 5.0
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the FirePro S9000's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 350W (FirePro S9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 90°C.

FeatureFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
TDP
150W-33%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
95
90°C-5%
Perf/Watt
33.8+50%
22.5
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W7100 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $114, while the FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 and now averages $156. The FirePro W7100 costs 26.9% less ($42 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (FirePro W7100) vs 32.4 (FirePro S9000) — the FirePro W7100 offers 37% better value. The FirePro W7100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W7100FirePro S9000
MSRP
$799-68%
$2499
Avg Price (30d)
$114-27%
$156
Performance per Dollar
44.4+37%
32.4
Codename
Tonga
Tahiti
Release
August 12 2014
August 24 2012
Ranking
#406
#441