
FirePro W7100 vs FirePro S9000

FirePro W7100
Popular choices:

FirePro S9000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W7100 is positioned at rank 184 and the FirePro S9000 is on rank 291, so the FirePro W7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W7100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro S9000.
| Insight | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $114 (vs $156), it costs 27% less, resulting in a 37% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+37%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($114) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($156) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7100 and FirePro S9000

FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the FirePro S9000 reaches 5,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro S9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9000). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,065 | 5,059 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.297 TFLOPS+2% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9000 has 4 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W7100) vs 768 KB (FirePro S9000) — the FirePro S9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 (FirePro S9000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the FirePro S9000's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 350W (FirePro S9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 90°C.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 90°C-5% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8+50% | 22.5 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7100 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $114, while the FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 and now averages $156. The FirePro W7100 costs 26.9% less ($42 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (FirePro W7100) vs 32.4 (FirePro S9000) — the FirePro W7100 offers 37% better value. The FirePro W7100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-68% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $114-27% | $156 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+37% | 32.4 |
| Codename | Tonga | Tahiti |
| Release | August 12 2014 | August 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #406 | #441 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












