FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

FirePro W7100

2014Core: 920 MHz

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro W7100

150

5,065

0.0%

Radeon HD 6970

Radeon HD8970M

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

210

5,200

+2.7%

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W7100 is positioned at rank #184 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

99%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

97%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

96%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

95%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

92%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

88%

#169

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2330%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

100%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

100%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

98%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

97%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

97%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

96%

#196

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

92%

#197

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $114), it costs 74% less, resulting in a 290.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+290.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($114)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W7100 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

FirePro W7100

The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
G3D Mark Score	5,065	5,200+3%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1792+300%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.297 TFLOPS+151%	1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	112+100%	56
L1 Cache	448 KB	896 KB+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	640 KB+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W7100) vs 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	320-bit+150%
L2 Cache	512 KB	640 KB+25%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Encoder	VCE 3.0	UVD 4.0
Decoder	UVD 5.0	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 33.3% difference. The FirePro W7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 76°C.

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
TDP	150W-29%	210W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	241mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	95	76°C-20%
Perf/Watt	33.8+36%	24.8

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W7100 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $114, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 73.7% less ($84 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (FirePro W7100) vs 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 290.3% better value. The FirePro W7100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).