M1 8-Core GPU vs Radeon R9 M395 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
M1 8-Core GPU vs Radeon R9 M395 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
M1 8-Core GPU vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Unknown architecture on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
M1 8-Core GPU vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
Graphics Performance
The M1 8-Core GPU scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 8 (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+1% | 4,934 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1792+22300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 158.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395. Memory bus width is Unified on the M1 8-Core GPU and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 176 GB/s+159% |
| Bus Width | Unified | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: N/A (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). OpenGL: 4.1 (Rosetta 2) vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | N/A | 12 (FL12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: Apple M1 Video Decoder vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Apple M1 Video Encoder | UVD |
| Decoder | Apple M1 Video Decoder | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The M1 8-Core GPU draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+153% | 65.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the M1 8-Core GPU came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, M1 8-Core GPU was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is M1 8-Core GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 16.4 |
| Release | November 10 2020 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #428 | #445 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon R9 M395
