
GeForce GTX 1630 vs M1 8-Core GPU

GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The M1 8-Core GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Legacy (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the M1 8-Core GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1630 and M1 8-Core GPU

GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1630 scores 4,992 and the M1 8-Core GPU reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,992 | 5,000 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+6300% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1630 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the M1 8-Core GPU has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) — a 41.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1630. Bus width: 64-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s+41% | 68 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | Unified |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630) vs N/A (M1 8-Core GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1 (Rosetta 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630) vs Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Apple M1 Video Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | Apple M1 Video Encoder |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | Apple M1 Video Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1630 draws 75W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.6 | 166.7+150% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $90, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) — the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $90 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU117 | — |
| Release | June 28 2022 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #444 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















