
GeForce GTX 1630 vs Quadro

GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:

Quadro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Per Dollar Quadro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1630 is significantly newer (2022 vs 1999). The GeForce GTX 1630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (1999 / Celsius (1999−2005)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $90 for the GeForce GTX 1630, it costs 44% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 80.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+80.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($90) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1630 and Quadro

GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.

Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1630 scores 4,992 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1630 is built on Turing while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 12 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,992 | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | Celsius |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 16+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 32+700% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1630 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1630 draws 75W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.6 | 66.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $90, while the Quadro launched at $1000 and now averages $50. The Quadro costs 44.4% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 100.0 (Quadro) — the Quadro offers 80.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 1999).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-85% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $90 | $50-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.5 | 100.0+80% |
| Codename | TU117 | NV10 |
| Release | June 28 2022 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #444 | #900 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











