CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 1630
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The CMP 30HX is positioned at rank #190 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $90 for the GeForce GTX 1630, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 47% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($90) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce GTX 1630
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 4,992+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+175% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+175% | 1.828 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+175% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1630 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 4th gen.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 75W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 229mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 60°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 66.6+70% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 and now averages $90. The CMP 30HX costs 33.3% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.5 (CMP 30HX) vs 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) — the CMP 30HX offers 46.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $150-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-33% | $90 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.5+47% | 55.5 |
| Codename | TU116 | TU117 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #447 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on CMP 30HX and GeForce GTX 1630
