CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 760

CMP 30HX

2021Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

GeForce GTX 760

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

CMP 30HX

125

4,892

+1.6%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 760

170

4,813

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The CMP 30HX is positioned at rank #190 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

99%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

98%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

96%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

91%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

89%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

88%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

87%

#174

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2414%

#189

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

100%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

100%

#192

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

99%

#195

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

95%

#196

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

95%

#199

Radeon Pro Duo

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799

91%

#200

P102-100

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

90%

#202

Quadro FX 2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The CMP 30HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The CMP 30HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The CMP 30HX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	CMP 30HX	GeForce GTX 760
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 760 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $60 for the CMP 30HX, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 96.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	CMP 30HX	GeForce GTX 760
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+96.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

CMP 30HX Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 760 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce GTX 760

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the GeForce GTX 760 reaches 4,813 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 760 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

Feature	CMP 30HX	GeForce GTX 760
G3D Mark Score	4,892+2%	4,813
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1408+22%	1152
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.027 TFLOPS+111%	2.378 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1785 MHz+73%	1033 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	88	96+9%
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+1456%	0.09 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	CMP 30HX	GeForce GTX 760
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	CMP 30HX	GeForce GTX 760
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	CMP 30HX	GeForce GTX 760
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 1st gen.

Feature	CMP 30HX	GeForce GTX 760
Encoder	No	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	No	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs		H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 760's 170W — a 30.5% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	CMP 30HX	GeForce GTX 760
TDP	125W-26%	170W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	229mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	39.1+38%	28.3

💰

Value Analysis

The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 760 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.5 (CMP 30HX) vs 160.4 (GeForce GTX 760) — the GeForce GTX 760 offers 96.8% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).