CMP 30HX vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

CMP 30HX vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

CMP 30HX vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

CMP 30HX

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌150% higher power demand at 125W vs 50W.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 125W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro T1000 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (5,000 vs 4,892), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

CMP 30HX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

CMP 30HX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro T1000 Max-Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

CMP 30HX vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 765 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Quadro T1000 Max-Q reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Quadro T1000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 896 (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 2.419 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	CMP 30HX	Quadro T1000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	4,892	5,000+2%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1408+57%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.027 TFLOPS+108%	2.419 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1785 MHz+32%	1350 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	88+57%	56
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+59%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	CMP 30HX	Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The CMP 30HX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Quadro T1000 Max-Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the CMP 30HX and 64-bit on the Quadro T1000 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	CMP 30HX	Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Quadro T1000 Max-Q's 50W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	CMP 30HX	Quadro T1000 Max-Q
TDP	125W	50W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	39.1	100.0+156%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is CMP 30HX (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	CMP 30HX	Quadro T1000 Max-Q
MSRP	$799	—
Codename	TU116	TU117
Release	February 25 2021	May 27 2019
Ranking	#447	#364

Search CMP 30HX on Amazon

Search Quadro T1000 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.