
CMP 30HX

Radeon R9 270X
CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 270X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 270X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R9 270X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so CMP 30HX is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌301.5% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 24.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 270X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 300% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 270X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 4,874 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+10% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+87% | 2.688 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+70% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+10% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+352% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 270X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the CMP 30HX and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: No vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 36.1% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80 C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-31% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+44% | 27.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 30HX came in at $799, while the Radeon R9 270X launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270X was 75.1% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 24.5 (Radeon R9 270X) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 301.6% better value. The newer card here is CMP 30HX (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $199-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 24.5+302% |
| Codename | TU116 | Curacao |
| Release | February 25 2021 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #447 | #448 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














