CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

CMP 30HX

2021Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······

CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

CMP 30HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is already obsolete for modern gaming, so CMP 30HX is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 77.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $349 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 81.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (5,000 vs 4,892), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
CMP 30HX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 cheaper on MSRP at $450 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 81.5% (11.1 vs 6.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, CMP 30HX has the stronger long-term case.

CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score
4,892
5,000+2%
Architecture
Turing
GCN 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1408
2048+45%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.027 TFLOPS+44%
3.482 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
88
128+45%
L1 Cache
1.4 MB+180%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+200%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the CMP 30HX and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+200%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 66.7% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
TDP
125W-50%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
39.1+96%
20.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the CMP 30HX came in at $799, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition was 43.7% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition offers 82% better value. The newer card here is CMP 30HX (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP
$799
$450-44%
Performance per Dollar
6.1
11.1+82%
Codename
TU116
Amethyst
Release
February 25 2021
November 23 2014
Ranking
#447
#436

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.