CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The CMP 30HX is positioned at rank 190 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is on rank 350, so the CMP 30HX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 30HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The CMP 30HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $450 for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 633.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+633.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 5,000+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2048+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+44% | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 128+45% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 66.7% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-50% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+96% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450 and now averages $450. The CMP 30HX costs 86.7% less ($390 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.5 (CMP 30HX) vs 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the CMP 30HX offers 634.2% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $450-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-87% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.5+634% | 11.1 |
| Codename | TU116 | Amethyst |
| Release | February 25 2021 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #447 | #436 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on CMP 30HX and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
