
CMP 30HX

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is already obsolete for modern gaming, so CMP 30HX is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌77.6% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 30HX vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 5,000+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2048+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+44% | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 128+45% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the CMP 30HX and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 66.7% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-50% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+96% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 30HX came in at $799, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition was 43.7% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition offers 82% better value. The newer card here is CMP 30HX (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $450-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 11.1+82% |
| Codename | TU116 | Amethyst |
| Release | February 25 2021 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #447 | #436 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














