
CMP 30HX vs Quadro T1000 (móvel)

CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The CMP 30HX is positioned at rank 190 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) is on rank 139, so the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $120 for the Quadro T1000 (móvel), it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 95.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Quadro T1000 (móvel)

CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 5,000+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+83% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+125% | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+23% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+83% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+87% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 50W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 50W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 100.0+156% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $120. The CMP 30HX costs 50% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.5 (CMP 30HX) vs 41.7 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the CMP 30HX offers 95.4% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $500-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-50% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.5+95% | 41.7 |
| Codename | TU116 | TU117 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #447 | #374 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











