CMP 30HX
VS
FirePro S9050

CMP 30HX vs FirePro S9050

CMP 30HX

2021Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
VS

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The CMP 30HX is positioned at rank 190 and the FirePro S9050 is on rank 271, so the CMP 30HX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX

#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
99%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
98%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
96%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
91%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
89%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
88%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
87%
#174
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2414%
#189
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
100%
#190
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
100%
#192
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
99%
#195
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
95%
#196
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
95%
#199
Radeon Pro Duo
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799
91%
#200
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
90%
#202
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9050

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
96%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
95%
#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
86%
#256
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6030%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
100%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
98%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
97%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
96%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
95%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
92%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
90%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
90%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
87%
#286
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The CMP 30HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The CMP 30HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9050 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S9050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.

InsightCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (254mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $1,825 for the FirePro S9050, it costs 97% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2936.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2936.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,825)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and FirePro S9050

NVIDIA

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

Graphics Performance

The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the FirePro S9050 reaches 4,901 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the FirePro S9050 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9050). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050).

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
G3D Mark Score
4,892
4,901
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1408
1792+27%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.027 TFLOPS+56%
3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
88
112+27%
L1 Cache
1.4 MB+218%
0.44 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+100%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9050 has 4 GB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+100%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (FirePro S9050). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050). Decoder: No vs UVD 3.2.

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
No
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the FirePro S9050's 225W — a 57.1% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (FirePro S9050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 254mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
TDP
125W-44%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
254mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-17%
90°C
Perf/Watt
39.1+79%
21.8
💰

Value Analysis

The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 and now averages $1825. The CMP 30HX costs 96.7% less ($1765 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.5 (CMP 30HX) vs 2.7 (FirePro S9050) — the CMP 30HX offers 2918.5% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
MSRP
$799-60%
$1999
Avg Price (30d)
$60-97%
$1825
Performance per Dollar
81.5+2919%
2.7
Codename
TU116
Tahiti
Release
February 25 2021
August 7 2014
Ranking
#447
#446