Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

CMP 30HX vs FirePro S9050

CPUCPUGPUGPU

CMP 30HX

2021Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
Similar parts
·
Buy on Amazon
VS

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

CMP 30HX vs FirePro S9050 Performance Spectrum

CMP 30HX
2 GB 125
4,892
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 465
brand logoGeForce GTX 680M
brand logoGeForce GTX 680MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 5GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
FirePro S9050
4 GB 225
4,901
+0.2%
brand logoRadeon RX 550
brand logoRadeon HD 6990M
brand logoRadeon 840M
brand logoRadeon R9 270
brand logoRadeon R9 390X
brand logoRadeon RX 6800M
brand logoRadeon 8060S
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

CMP 30HX vs FirePro S9050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

CMP 30HX

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 149.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • ✅FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so CMP 30HX is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 229mm instead of 254mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    150.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • ❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
  • ❌10.9% longer card at 254mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro S9050 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (4,901 vs 4,892), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
CMP 30HX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 30HX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,200 cheaper on MSRP at $799 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 149.7% (6.1 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. FirePro S9050 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

CMP 30HX vs FirePro S9050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the FirePro S9050 reaches 4,901 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the FirePro S9050 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9050). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050).

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
G3D Mark Score
4,892
4,901
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1408
1792+27%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.027 TFLOPS+56%
3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
88
112+27%
L1 Cache
1.4 MB+218%
0.44 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+100%
0.75 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The CMP 30HX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9050 carries 4 GB. FirePro S9050 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the CMP 30HX and 64-bit on the FirePro S9050. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+100%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (FirePro S9050). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050). Decoder: No vs UVD 3.2.

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
No
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the FirePro S9050's 225W — a 57.1% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (FirePro S9050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 254mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
TDP
125W-44%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
254mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-17%
90°C
Perf/Watt
39.1+79%
21.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the CMP 30HX came in at $799, while the FirePro S9050 launched at $1999. On MSRP, CMP 30HX was 60% cheaper ($1200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 2.5 (FirePro S9050) — the CMP 30HX offers 144% better value. The newer card here is CMP 30HX (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureCMP 30HXFirePro S9050
MSRP
$799-60%
$1999
Performance per Dollar
6.1+144%
2.5
Codename
TU116
Tahiti
Release
February 25 2021
August 7 2014
Ranking
#447
#446
Search CMP 30HX on AmazonSearch FirePro S9050 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.