GeForce GTX 1630 vs RTXA5000-8Q
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-8Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $90 versus $2,500 for the RTXA5000-8Q, it costs 96% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2720.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2720.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($90) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1630 and RTXA5000-8Q
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1630 scores 4,992 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1630 is built on Turing while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,992+2% | 4,916 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 8192+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+1419% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+5% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 32 | 256+700% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1630 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-8Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1630 draws 75W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 101.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.6+211% | 21.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $90, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $2500. The GeForce GTX 1630 costs 96.4% less ($2410 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 2675% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-94% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $90-96% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.5+2675% | 2.0 |
| Codename | TU117 | GA102 |
| Release | June 28 2022 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #444 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1630 and RTXA5000-8Q
