GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 5300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1630 and Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1630 scores 4,992 and the Radeon RX 5300M reaches 5,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1630 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1445 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,992 | 5,044+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1408+175% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS | 4.069 TFLOPS+123% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+24% | 1445 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 88+175% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1630 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300M) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 5300M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 168 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1630 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-12% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.6+12% | 59.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $90 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 28 2022 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #444 | #442 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1630 and Radeon RX 5300M
