Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 1630

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1630

2022Core: 1740 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 1630 Performance Spectrum

FirePro S9050
4 GB 225
4,901
0.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 550
brand logoRadeon HD 6990M
brand logoRadeon 840M
brand logoRadeon R9 270
brand logoRadeon R9 390X
brand logoRadeon RX 6800M
brand logoRadeon 8060S
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
GeForce GTX 1630
4 GB 75
4,992
+1.9%
brand logoGeForce GTX 770M
brand logoGeForce GTX 590
brand logoGeForce GTX 780M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 660 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 5GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 1630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1232.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
  • ❌75.2% longer card at 254mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GTX 1630

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $1,849 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1257.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • ✅FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1630 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 145mm instead of 254mm, a 109mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (4,992 vs 4,901), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1630 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,849 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1257.4% (33.3 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 1630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1630

The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630).

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce GTX 1630
G3D Mark Score
4,901
4,992+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1792+250%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+76%
1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+250%
32
L1 Cache
448 KB
512 KB+14%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1630 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S9050 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce GTX 1630
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S9050 and 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 1630. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce GTX 1630
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce GTX 1630
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630).

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce GTX 1630
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 6th gen
Decoder
UVD 3.2
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 254mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 60°C.

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce GTX 1630
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
254mm
145mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
60°C-33%
Perf/Watt
21.8
66.6+206%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S9050 came in at $1999, while the GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1630 was 92.5% cheaper ($1849 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 33.3 (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 1232% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1630 (2022 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP
$1999
$150-92%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
33.3+1232%
Codename
Tahiti
TU117
Release
August 7 2014
June 28 2022
Ranking
#446
#444
Search FirePro S9050 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1630 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.