
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 270X

FirePro S9050
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 270X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro S9050 is positioned at rank #271 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9050
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S9050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 270X.
| Insight | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 270X holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $1,825), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4437.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4437.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,825) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and Radeon R9 270X

FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901 | 4,874 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+40% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+20% | 2.688 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+40% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro S9050) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 270X) — the FirePro S9050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80 C.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 180W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80 C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 27.1+24% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1825, while the Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 and now averages $40. The Radeon R9 270X costs 97.8% less ($1785 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (FirePro S9050) vs 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 4411.1% better value. The FirePro S9050 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $199-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1825 | $40-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 121.8+4411% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Curacao |
| Release | August 7 2014 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #446 | #448 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















