FirePro S9050
VS
Radeon R9 270X

FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 270X

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270X

2013Boost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro S9050 is positioned at rank #271 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9050

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
96%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
95%
#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
86%
#256
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6030%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
100%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
98%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
97%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
96%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
95%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
92%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
90%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
90%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
87%
#286
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S9050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 270X.

InsightFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 270X holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $1,825), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4437.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+4437.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,825)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and Radeon R9 270X

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 270X

The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
G3D Mark Score
4,901
4,874
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792+40%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+20%
2.688 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+40%
80
L1 Cache
448 KB+40%
320 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro S9050) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 270X) — the FirePro S9050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80 C.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
TDP
225W
180W-20%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
254mm
241mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
80 C-11%
Perf/Watt
21.8
27.1+24%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1825, while the Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 and now averages $40. The Radeon R9 270X costs 97.8% less ($1785 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (FirePro S9050) vs 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 4411.1% better value. The FirePro S9050 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 270X
MSRP
$1999
$199-90%
Avg Price (30d)
$1825
$40-98%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
121.8+4411%
Codename
Tahiti
Curacao
Release
August 7 2014
October 8 2013
Ranking
#446
#448