FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 M395

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 M395 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 566.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,699 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 570.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M395 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (4,934 vs 4,901), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S9050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M395 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,699 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 570.8% (16.4 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M395 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro S9050 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score
4,901
4,934
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792
1792

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 carries 2 GB. FirePro S9050 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S9050 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 M395
DirectX
12
12 (FL12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 M395
Encoder
VCE 1.0
UVD
Decoder
UVD 3.2
VCE
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 M395
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
254mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
75°C-17%
Perf/Watt
21.8
65.8+202%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S9050 came in at $1999, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395 was 85% cheaper ($1699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Radeon R9 M395 offers 556% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395 (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon R9 M395
MSRP
$1999
$300-85%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
16.4+556%
Codename
Tahiti
Release
August 7 2014
June 9 2015
Ranking
#446
#445

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.