
FirePro S9050

Radeon R9 M395
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 M395 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 M395 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌566.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,699 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 570.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901 | 4,934 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 carries 2 GB. FirePro S9050 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S9050 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 254mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 65.8+202% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S9050 came in at $1999, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395 was 85% cheaper ($1699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Radeon R9 M395 offers 556% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $300-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 16.4+556% |
| Codename | Tahiti | — |
| Release | August 7 2014 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #446 | #445 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














