CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1630 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460 OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 OEM and GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM scores 5,000 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 4,992 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 512+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8736 TFLOPS | 1.828 TFLOPS+109% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1630 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) — a 13.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 460 OEM. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s+13% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 210mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 300W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 210mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.3 | 66.6+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $90 |
| Codename | GF104 | TU117 |
| Release | October 11 2010 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #829 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 460 OEM and GeForce GTX 1630
