GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M395X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M395X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395X

2015

Why buy it

✅30.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M395X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (5,120 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 OEM is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M395X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M395X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460 OEM has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score	5,000	5,120+2%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	2048+510%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8736 TFLOPS	2.961 TFLOPS+239%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	128+129%
L1 Cache	448 KB	512 KB+14%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M395X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M395X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) — a 47.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395X. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 OEM and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	108.8 GB/s	160 GB/s+47%
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon R9 M395X
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	210mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	33.3	68.3+105%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395X (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP	—	$600
Codename	GF104	Amethyst
Release	October 11 2010	May 5 2015
Ranking	#829	#438

Search GeForce GTX 460 OEM on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M395X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.