
GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Radeon R9 M295X
GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M295X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M295X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M295X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌20900% longer card at 210mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅30.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 210mm, a 209mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M295X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 5,150+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 2048+510% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8736 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS+239% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M295X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M295X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 61.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 OEM and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 176 GB/s+62% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 210mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 210mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.3+62% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R9 M295X (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GF104 | Amethyst |
| Release | October 11 2010 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #829 | #437 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















