
Arc A370M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A370M
2022Why buy it
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
2010Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
Arc A370M
2022GeForce GTX 460 OEM
2010Why buy it
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A370M better than GeForce GTX 460 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 460 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Arc A370M
Arc A370M
The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the GeForce GTX 460 OEM reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 460 OEM uses Fermi, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,115+2% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+205% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.174 TFLOPS+263% | 0.8736 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+241% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A370M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A370M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 OEM has 2 GB. The Arc A370M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) β a 2.9% advantage for the Arc A370M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) β the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s+3% | 108.8 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 460 OEM's 150W β a 124.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70Β°C.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-77% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 210mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 70Β°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 146.1+339% | 33.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













