Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM Performance Spectrum

Arc A370M

4 GB 35

5,115

+2.3%

5,000

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

✅32.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (5,115 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 40nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A370M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the GeForce GTX 460 OEM reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 460 OEM uses Fermi, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 460 OEM
G3D Mark Score	5,115+2%	5,000
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Fermi
Process Node	6 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1024+205%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS+263%	0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+14%	56
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+241%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A370M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 OEM carries 2 GB. Arc A370M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) — a 2.9% advantage for the Arc A370M. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 OEM. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 460 OEM
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s+3%	108.8 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 460 OEM
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 460 OEM's 150W — a 124.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 460 OEM
TDP	35W-77%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	0mm	210mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	90	70°C-22%
Perf/Watt	146.1+339%	33.3