Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Intel

Arc A370M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

2010Core: 650 MHz

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • βœ…More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022βˆ’2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A370M better than GeForce GTX 460 OEM?
Yes. Arc A370M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,115 vs 5,000 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Arc A370M is a 2022 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a 2010 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A370M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2010, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 40nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Arc A370M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Arc A370M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Arc A370M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.3% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (35W vs 150W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is GeForce GTX 460 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 460 OEM is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Arc A370M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
1080p
low105 FPS51 FPS
medium90 FPS40 FPS
high73 FPS24 FPS
ultra44 FPS15 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS28 FPS
medium79 FPS20 FPS
high57 FPS12 FPS
ultra33 FPS7 FPS
4K
low30 FPS11 FPS
medium28 FPS9 FPS
high19 FPS5 FPS
ultra16 FPS4 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
1080p
low120 FPS83 FPS
medium93 FPS59 FPS
high72 FPS46 FPS
ultra54 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS47 FPS
medium65 FPS31 FPS
high51 FPS21 FPS
ultra39 FPS16 FPS
4K
low50 FPS18 FPS
medium38 FPS12 FPS
high30 FPS9 FPS
ultra21 FPS6 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
1080p
low230 FPS225 FPS
medium184 FPS180 FPS
high153 FPS129 FPS
ultra115 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS169 FPS
medium138 FPS135 FPS
high115 FPS104 FPS
ultra86 FPS84 FPS
4K
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium92 FPS90 FPS
high77 FPS65 FPS
ultra58 FPS50 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
1080p
low177 FPS161 FPS
medium146 FPS130 FPS
high129 FPS116 FPS
ultra100 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low125 FPS109 FPS
medium107 FPS89 FPS
high93 FPS79 FPS
ultra72 FPS59 FPS
4K
low74 FPS64 FPS
medium59 FPS49 FPS
high48 FPS39 FPS
ultra35 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Intel

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the GeForce GTX 460 OEM reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 460 OEM uses Fermi, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).

FeatureArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
G3D Mark Score
5,115+2%
5,000
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Fermi
Process Node
6 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1024+205%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.174 TFLOPS+263%
0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64+14%
56
L1 Cache
1.5 MB+241%
0.44 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A370M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 OEM has 2 GB. The Arc A370M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) β€” a 2.9% advantage for the Arc A370M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) β€” the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s+3%
108.8 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).

FeatureArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 460 OEM's 150W β€” a 124.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70Β°C.

FeatureArc A370MGeForce GTX 460 OEM
TDP
35W-77%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
210mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
90
70Β°C-22%
Perf/Watt
146.1+339%
33.3