GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon RX 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon RX 5300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon RX 5300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5300M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌76.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 85W.

Radeon RX 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅5.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 85W instead of 150W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 5300M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (5,044 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 5300M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon RX 5300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon RX 5300M

The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM scores 5,000 and the Radeon RX 5300M reaches 5,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M). Raw compute: 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon RX 5300M
G3D Mark Score	5,000	5,044
Architecture	Fermi	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	336	1408+319%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8736 TFLOPS	4.069 TFLOPS+366%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	88+57%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5300M is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 460 OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon RX 5300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300M carries 3 GB. Radeon RX 5300M gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300M) — a 54.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 5300M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 OEM and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon RX 5300M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	108.8 GB/s	168 GB/s+54%
Bus Width	256-bit+167%	96-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 85W — a 55.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 OEM	Radeon RX 5300M
TDP	150W	85W-43%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	210mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	33.3	59.3+78%