M3 Max 16-Core
VS
Core i9-13950HX

M3 Max 16-Core vs Core i9-13950HX

M3 Max 16-Core

16 Cores16 ThrdWMax: 4.06 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i9-13950HX

24 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M3 Max 16-Core

#210
M3 Max 16-Core
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13950HX

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
104%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
96%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
95%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i9-13950HX leads in gaming performance. However, the M3 Max 16-Core is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightM3 Max 16-CoreCore i9-13950HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($199)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightM3 Max 16-CoreCore i9-13950HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($199)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M3 Max 16-Core and Core i9-13950HX

M3 Max 16-Core

The M3 Max 16-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 41,257 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Core i9-13950HX

The Core i9-13950HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,012 points. Launch price was $590.

Processing Power

The M3 Max 16-Core packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-13950HX offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13950HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 16-Core versus 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13950HX — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13950HX (base: 2.748 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i9-13950HX is built on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M3 Max 16-Core scores 41,257 against the Core i9-13950HX's 41,012 — a 0.6% lead for the M3 Max 16-Core.

FeatureM3 Max 16-CoreCore i9-13950HX
Cores / Threads
16 / 16
24 / 32+50%
Boost Clock
4.06 GHz
5.5 GHz+35%
Base Clock
2.748 GHz+25%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
PassMark
41,257
41,012
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M3 Max 16-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-13950HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the M3 Max 16-Core versus 5600 on the Core i9-13950HX — the M3 Max 16-Core supports 13.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13950HX supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (M3 Max 16-Core) vs 2 (Core i9-13950HX). PCIe lanes: 0 (M3 Max 16-Core) vs 20 (Core i9-13950HX) — the Core i9-13950HX offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M3 (M3 Max 16-Core) and Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13950HX).

FeatureM3 Max 16-CoreCore i9-13950HX
Socket
none
FCBGA1964
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
6400+14%
5600
Max RAM Capacity
128
192+50%
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13950HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-13950HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 16-Core) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13950HX). Both include integrated graphics Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) (M3 Max 16-Core) and Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13950HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M3 Max 16-Core rivals Core i9-13950HX; Core i9-13950HX rivals M3 Max 16-Core.

FeatureM3 Max 16-CoreCore i9-13950HX
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core)
Intel UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)
VT-x, VT-d