M3 Max 16-Core
VS
Ryzen 7 8840HX

M3 Max 16-Core vs Ryzen 7 8840HX

M3 Max 16-Core

16 Cores16 ThrdWMax: 4.06 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HX

12 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M3 Max 16-Core

#210
M3 Max 16-Core
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 8840HX

#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
119%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
118%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
114%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
112%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
104%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
104%
#192
Ryzen 7 8840HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 7 8840HX delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the M3 Max 16-Core in both compute-intensive tasks (2.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightM3 Max 16-CoreRyzen 7 8840HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Dragon Range (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightM3 Max 16-CoreRyzen 7 8840HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 7 8840HX

M3 Max 16-Core

The M3 Max 16-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 41,257 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HX

The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The M3 Max 16-Core packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the M3 Max 16-Core has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 16-Core versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HX (base: 2.748 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8840HX is built on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M3 Max 16-Core scores 41,257 against the Ryzen 7 8840HX's 42,275 — a 2.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HX.

FeatureM3 Max 16-CoreRyzen 7 8840HX
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+33%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
4.06 GHz
5.1 GHz+26%
Base Clock
2.748 GHz
2.9 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-40%
5 nm
Architecture
Dragon Range (2025)
PassMark
41,257
42,275+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M3 Max 16-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the M3 Max 16-Core versus 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — the M3 Max 16-Core supports 13.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The M3 Max 16-Core supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 64 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (M3 Max 16-Core) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 8840HX). PCIe lanes: 0 (M3 Max 16-Core) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M3 (M3 Max 16-Core) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX).

FeatureM3 Max 16-CoreRyzen 7 8840HX
Socket
none
FL1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
6400+14%
5600
Max RAM Capacity
128+100%
64
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 16-Core) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8840HX). Both include integrated graphics Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) (M3 Max 16-Core) and AMD Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M3 Max 16-Core rivals Core i9-13950HX; Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H.

FeatureM3 Max 16-CoreRyzen 7 8840HX
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core)
AMD Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V