EPYC 7F52 vs M3 Max 16-Core
EPYC 7F52
M3 Max 16-Core
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F52
Performance Per Dollar M3 Max 16-Core
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7F52 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7F52 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F52 and M3 Max 16-Core
EPYC 7F52
The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.
M3 Max 16-Core
The M3 Max 16-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 41,257 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F52 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, matching the M3 Max 16-Core's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 16-Core — a 4% clock advantage for the M3 Max 16-Core (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The EPYC 7F52 is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7F52 scores 41,388 against the M3 Max 16-Core's 41,257 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7F52.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.06 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+27% | 2.748 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 41,388 | 41,257 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F52 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M3 Max 16-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F52 versus 6400 on the M3 Max 16-Core — the M3 Max 16-Core supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F52 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7F52) vs 4 (M3 Max 16-Core). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F52) vs 0 (M3 Max 16-Core) — the EPYC 7F52 offers 128 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F52) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 16-Core).
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+3100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7F52 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7F52) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 16-Core). The M3 Max 16-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core)), while the EPYC 7F52 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; M3 Max 16-Core rivals Core i9-13950HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7F52 and M3 Max 16-Core
