EPYC 7F52 vs EPYC 7313P

EPYC 7F52 vs EPYC 7313P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7F52

16 / 32

41,388

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 7313P

16 / 32

41,017

0.0%

Ryzen 7 6800H

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7F52 vs EPYC 7313P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7F52 vs EPYC 7313P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7F52

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.4 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($3,100 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
❌54.8% higher power demand at 240W vs 155W.

EPYC 7313P

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,187 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $3,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 236.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 13.4 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $3,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 240W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7F52 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (41,017 vs 41,388).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7F52 better than EPYC 7313P?

Yes. EPYC 7F52 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7F52 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7F52 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7F52 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7313P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7F52 comes in 239.5% more expensive on MSRP at $3,100 MSRP versus $913 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7313P is also 236.5% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 13.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7313P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7F52 vs EPYC 7313P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F52

The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.

EPYC 7313P

The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7313P share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P — a 5.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 7F52 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7F52 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 7313P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F52 scores 41,388 against the EPYC 7313P's 41,017 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7F52. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P.

Feature	EPYC 7F52	EPYC 7313P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+5%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+17%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm+
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	41,388	41,017

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F52) and SP3 (EPYC 7313P).

Feature	EPYC 7F52	EPYC 7313P
Socket	SP3	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334.

Feature	EPYC 7F52	EPYC 7313P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7F52 was priced at $3100, while the EPYC 7313P came in at $913. On launch pricing ($3100 vs $913), EPYC 7313P was $2187 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F52 delivers 13.4 pts/$ vs 44.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7313P — making the EPYC 7313P the 108.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7F52	EPYC 7313P
MSRP	$3100	$913-71%
Performance per Dollar	13.4	44.9+235%
Release Date	2020	2021

Search EPYC 7F52 on Amazon

Search EPYC 7313P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.