EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen AI Max 390
EPYC 7F52
Ryzen AI Max 390
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F52
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen AI Max 390
EPYC 7F52
The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.
Ryzen AI Max 390
The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F52 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7F52 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 390 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 7F52 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F52 scores 41,388 against the Ryzen AI Max 390's 41,834 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 390. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 390.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 41,388 | 41,834+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F52 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F52 versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 390 — the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F52 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7F52) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 390). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F52) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max 390) — the EPYC 7F52 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F52) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390).
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 8000+150% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+3100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the EPYC 7F52 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7F52 launched at $3100 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max 390 debuted at $0. At current prices ($1826 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max 390 is $1826 cheaper.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1826 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.7 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen AI Max 390
