EPYC 7F52
Ryzen AI Max 390
EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen AI Max 390 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen AI Max 390 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen AI Max 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7F52
2020Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max 390 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,388 vs 41,834).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,100 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 390 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌336.4% higher power demand at 240W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max 390 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI Max 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 240W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8050S, while EPYC 7F52 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7F52, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max 390 better than EPYC 7F52?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen AI Max 390 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7F52
The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.
Ryzen AI Max 390
The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F52 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7F52 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 390 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 7F52 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F52 scores 41,388 against the Ryzen AI Max 390's 41,834 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 390. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 390.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 41,388 | 41,834+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F52 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F52 versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 390 — the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F52 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7F52) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 390). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F52) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max 390) — the EPYC 7F52 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F52) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390).
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 8000+150% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+3100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the EPYC 7F52 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7F52 was priced at $3100, while the Ryzen AI Max 390 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($3100 vs $0), Ryzen AI Max 390 was $3100 cheaper.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Ryzen AI Max 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen AI Max 390
