EPYC 7F52 vs Core i9-13900T
EPYC 7F52
Core i9-13900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F52
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7F52 | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) | ✅ More affordable ($570) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7F52 | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+231%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) | ✅ More affordable ($570) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F52 and Core i9-13900T
EPYC 7F52
The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.
Core i9-13900T
The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F52 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core i9-13900T offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 versus 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T — a 30.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900T (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The EPYC 7F52 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core i9-13900T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F52 scores 41,388 against the Core i9-13900T's 42,735 — a 3.2% lead for the Core i9-13900T. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 32+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5.3 GHz+36% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+218% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+611% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 41,388 | 42,735+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F52 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-13900T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F52 versus 5600 on the Core i9-13900T — the Core i9-13900T supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F52 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7F52) vs 2 (Core i9-13900T). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F52) vs 20 (Core i9-13900T) — the EPYC 7F52 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F52) and Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T).
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+2033% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+540% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7F52) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900T). The Core i9-13900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 7F52 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7F52 launched at $3100 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900T debuted at $549. At current prices ($1826 vs $570), the Core i9-13900T is $1256 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F52 delivers 22.7 pts/$ vs 75.0 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900T — making the Core i9-13900T the 107.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7F52 | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3100 | $549-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1826 | $570-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.7 | 75.0+230% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7F52 and Core i9-13900T
