
M4 (10 cores)

Xeon D-2766NT
M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon D-2766NT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon D-2766NT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon D-2766NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M4 (10 cores)
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 97W, a 93W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,784 vs 24,013).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2766NT, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Xeon D-2766NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 (10 cores) across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌2325% higher power demand at 97W vs 4W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while M4 (10 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is M4 (10 cores) better than Xeon D-2766NT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon D-2766NT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M4 (10 cores)
The M4 (10 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 7 May 2024 (1 year ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 23,784 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2766NT
The Xeon D-2766NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,013 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The M4 (10 cores) packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon D-2766NT offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon D-2766NT has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the M4 (10 cores) versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2766NT — a 34.7% clock advantage for the M4 (10 cores) (base: 2.89 GHz vs 2 GHz). In PassMark, the M4 (10 cores) scores 23,784 against the Xeon D-2766NT's 24,013 — a 1% lead for the Xeon D-2766NT.
| Feature | M4 (10 cores) | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 14 / 28+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+42% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.89 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 20 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | — |
| Process | 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| PassMark | 23,784 | 24,013 |
Memory & Platform
The M4 (10 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2766NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M4 (10 cores) | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













