M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1390

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1390 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M4 (10 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,784 vs 23,902).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1390, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon W-1390

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while M4 (10 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1900% higher power demand at 80W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M4 (10 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1390 better than M4 (10 cores)?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1390 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M4 (10 cores) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1390 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1390 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1390 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1390 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $494 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (48.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 (10 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1390 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M4 (10 cores)

The M4 (10 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 7 May 2024 (1 year ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 23,784 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1390

The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.

⚡

Processing Power

The M4 (10 cores) packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M4 (10 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the M4 (10 cores) versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390 (base: 2.89 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W-1390 is built on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (10 cores) scores 23,784 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-1390.

Feature	M4 (10 cores)	Xeon W-1390
Cores / Threads	10 / 10+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.89 GHz+3%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	3 nm-79%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	23,784	23,902

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 (10 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.