M4 (10 cores)
VS
Xeon W-1390

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1390

M4 (10 cores)

10 Cores10 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1390

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M4 (10 cores)

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
125%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
122%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
114%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
114%
#197
M4 (10 cores)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1390

#210
EPYC 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
110%
#214
Xeon 6521P
MSRP: $1250|Avg: $1250
107%
#215
Xeon E-2456
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $289
107%
#218
Xeon Gold 5512U
MSRP: $1230|Avg: N/A
104%
#219
Xeon D-1733NT
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
102%
#220
Xeon 6520P
MSRP: $1295|Avg: $1295
102%
#221
Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP: $2977|Avg: N/A
101%
#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
101%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
100%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
99%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
98%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
97%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
97%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
96%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
96%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
95%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
95%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($400) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-1390 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightM4 (10 cores)Xeon W-1390
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M4 (10 cores) ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($400 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightM4 (10 cores)Xeon W-1390
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-1390

M4 (10 cores)

The M4 (10 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 7 May 2024 (1 year ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 23,784 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon W-1390

The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.

Processing Power

The M4 (10 cores) packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M4 (10 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the M4 (10 cores) versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390 (base: 2.89 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W-1390 is built on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (10 cores) scores 23,784 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-1390.

FeatureM4 (10 cores)Xeon W-1390
Cores / Threads
10 / 10+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.89 GHz+3%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
3 nm-79%
14 nm
Architecture
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark
23,784
23,902
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 (10 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM4 (10 cores)Xeon W-1390
Socket
none
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0