M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1370P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1370P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1370P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M4 (10 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 125W, a 121W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1370P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1370P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon W-1370P

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,698 vs 23,784).
❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while M4 (10 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3025% higher power demand at 125W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M4 (10 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 (10 cores) better than Xeon W-1370P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1370P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M4 (10 cores) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 (10 cores) is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M4 (10 cores) is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1370P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. M4 (10 cores) comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-1370P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1370P is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (73.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 (10 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 10 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon W-1370P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M4 (10 cores)

The M4 (10 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 7 May 2024 (1 year ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 23,784 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1370P

The Xeon W-1370P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,698 points. Launch price was $428.

⚡

Processing Power

The M4 (10 cores) packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon W-1370P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M4 (10 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the M4 (10 cores) versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1370P — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370P (base: 2.89 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon W-1370P is built on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (10 cores) scores 23,784 against the Xeon W-1370P's 23,698 — a 0.4% lead for the M4 (10 cores).

Feature	M4 (10 cores)	Xeon W-1370P
Cores / Threads	10 / 10+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.2 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.89 GHz	3.6 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	—	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	3 nm-79%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	23,784	23,698

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 (10 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.