M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon Gold 6122

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon Gold 6122 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon Gold 6122: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M4 (10 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 120W, a 116W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6122, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.

Xeon Gold 6122

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 (10 cores) across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 23,784).
❌2900% higher power demand at 120W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while M4 (10 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 (10 cores) better than Xeon Gold 6122?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6122 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M4 (10 cores) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M4 (10 cores) is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 (10 cores) is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M4 (10 cores) still makes the most sense overall. M4 (10 cores) comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 (10 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 10 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon Gold 6122 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M4 (10 cores)

The M4 (10 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 7 May 2024 (1 year ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 23,784 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6122

The Xeon Gold 6122 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The M4 (10 cores) packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6122 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6122 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the M4 (10 cores) versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6122 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the M4 (10 cores) (base: 2.89 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). In PassMark, the M4 (10 cores) scores 23,784 against the Xeon Gold 6122's 23,781 — a 0% lead for the M4 (10 cores).

Feature	M4 (10 cores)	Xeon Gold 6122
Cores / Threads	10 / 10	20 / 40+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+19%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.89 GHz+61%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	28 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	—
Process	3 nm-79%	14 nm
PassMark	23,784	23,781

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 (10 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6122 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.