
M4 (10 cores)

Xeon E-2388G
M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon E-2388G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon E-2388G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon E-2388G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M4 (10 cores)
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2388G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2388G, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E-2388G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,572 vs 23,784).
- ❌2275% higher power demand at 95W vs 4W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M4 (10 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is M4 (10 cores) better than Xeon E-2388G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M4 (10 cores) vs Xeon E-2388G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M4 (10 cores)
The M4 (10 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 7 May 2024 (1 year ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 23,784 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2388G
The Xeon E-2388G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,572 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The M4 (10 cores) packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon E-2388G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M4 (10 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the M4 (10 cores) versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2388G — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2388G (base: 2.89 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E-2388G is built on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (10 cores) scores 23,784 against the Xeon E-2388G's 23,572 — a 0.9% lead for the M4 (10 cores).
| Feature | M4 (10 cores) | Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.89 GHz | 3.2 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | — | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 512K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,784 | 23,572 |
Memory & Platform
The M4 (10 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2388G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M4 (10 cores) | Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













