
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

Xeon Gold 6230N
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Xeon Gold 6230N Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Xeon Gold 6230N FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Xeon Gold 6230N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6230N across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,125 vs 4,175).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6230N, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Xeon Gold 6230N
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6230N better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Xeon Gold 6230N Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
The MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 9 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. Built on 6 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Gold 6230N
The Xeon Gold 6230N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 4,175 points. Launch price was $2,046.
Processing Power
The MediaTek Kompanio 1300T packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6230N offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6230N has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6230N — a 29.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6230N (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The MediaTek Kompanio 1300T uses the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6230N uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T scores 4,125 against the Xeon Gold 6230N's 4,175 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6230N.
| Feature | MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | Xeon Gold 6230N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | — | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 20 MB |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 4,125 | 4,175+1% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















