Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
VS
Pentium 4 2.80

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium 4 2.80

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 2.80

1 Cores1 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.79 GHz2002

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is positioned at rank 1157 and the Pentium 4 2.80 is on rank 1114, so the Pentium 4 2.80 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

#1144
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4121%
#1145
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4060%
#1146
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3728%
#1147
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3711%
#1148
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3677%
#1150
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3551%
#1151
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3404%
#1152
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3399%
#1153
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3308%
#1156
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
100%
#1157
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1158
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1159
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1161
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1163
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1164
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1165
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1166
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
95%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1169
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1170
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1171
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 4 2.80

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
249372%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
235632%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
171088%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
51542%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
40826%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
35715%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
20456%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
20189%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
18382%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
18381%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
18175%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
17685%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
17438%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
17367%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
17210%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
100%
#1115
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
100%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
99%
#1117
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
98%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
97%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
94%
#1120
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
94%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
93%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
90%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
88%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
82%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
81%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
78%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
77%
#1128
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
73%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium 4 2.80 leads in gaming performance. However, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium 4 2.80
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium 4 2.80
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium 4 2.80

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium 4 2.80

The Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium 4 2.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus 2.79 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.80 — a 43.1% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.80. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Pentium 4 2.80's 408 — a 2.9% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium 4 2.80
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.79 GHz+55%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K
512 kB
Process
130 nm
Architecture
Oakville (2003−2004)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
420+3%
408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium 4 2.80
Socket
754
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
400
Max RAM Capacity
2
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) / not specified (Pentium 4 2.80). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium 4 2.80
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false