Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 / 1

420

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 715

1 / 1

405

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

2004

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌2338.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 21W.

Pentium M 715

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 512W, a 491W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ better than Pentium M 715?

Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 715 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 715

The Pentium M 715 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M 715 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 715 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Pentium M 715 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Pentium M 715's 405 — a 3.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+	Pentium M 715
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+20%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K+25500%	2 MB
Process	—	90 nm
Architecture	Oakville (2003−2004)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	420+4%	405

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 715 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 715 — the Pentium M 715 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) and Socket 479 (Pentium M 715).