Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2003
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Mobile Sempron M100

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2009
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
1 / 1
450
+0.4%
brand logoAthlon XP 2000+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon XP 2600+
brand logoAthlon 64 2600+
brand logoRyzen 5 8640HS
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Mobile Sempron M100
1 / 1
448
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1900+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon XP 2600+
brand logoAthlon 64 2600+
brand logoRyzen 5 8640HS
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron M100
low11 FPS
medium11 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra11 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

2003

Why buy it

  • ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Mobile Sempron M100

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (448 vs 450).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ better than Mobile Sempron M100?
    Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% higher PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Mobile Sempron M100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Mobile Sempron M100

    The Mobile Sempron M100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: S. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Mobile Sempron M100 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron M100 — identical boost frequencies. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Mobile Sempron M100 uses Caspian (2009) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Mobile Sempron M100's 448 — a 0.4% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3000+Mobile Sempron M100
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz
    2 GHz
    L2 Cache
    512K
    512 kB
    Process
    —
    40 nm
    Architecture
    Oakville (2003−2004)
    Caspian (2009)
    PassMark
    450
    448
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron M100 uses S (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3000+Mobile Sempron M100
    Socket
    754
    S
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    2
    —
    RAM Channels
    1
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) / not specified (Mobile Sempron M100). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3000+Mobile Sempron M100
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    false
    —