Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

1 / 1

450

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 745

1 / 1

465

+3.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium M 745 across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (450 vs 465).
❌2338.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 21W.

Pentium M 745

2004

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 21W instead of 512W, a 491W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 745 better than Mobile Athlon 64 3000+?

Yes. Pentium M 745 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 745 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 745 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 745 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 745 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 745 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2004 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 745

The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium M 745 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Pentium M 745 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Pentium M 745's 465 — a 3.3% lead for the Pentium M 745.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3000+	Pentium M 745
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K+25500%	2 MB
Process	—	90 nm
Architecture	Oakville (2003−2004)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	450	465+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 745 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus DDR2 on the Pentium M 745 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ supports 19900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) and Intel 855GME,Intel 855PM (Pentium M 745).