E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ Performance Spectrum

E1 Micro-6200T

2 / 2

475

+5.6%

Athlon XP 2100+

Athlon XP 2400+

Athlon XP 2700+

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Ryzen 5 8640HS

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

1 / 1

450

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1 Micro-6200T

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E1 Micro-6200T across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (450 vs 475).
❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is E1 Micro-6200T better than Mobile Athlon 64 3000+?

Yes. E1 Micro-6200T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E1 Micro-6200T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.1% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1 Micro-6200T is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1 Micro-6200T still makes the most sense overall. E1 Micro-6200T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1 Micro-6200T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E1 Micro-6200T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. The E1 Micro-6200T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the E1 Micro-6200T scores 475 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+'s 450 — a 5.4% lead for the E1 Micro-6200T.

Feature	E1 Micro-6200T	Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	2 GHz+43%
Base Clock	1 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512K
Process	28 nm	—
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Oakville (2003−2004)
PassMark	475+6%	450

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1 Micro-6200T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	E1 Micro-6200T	Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Socket	FT3	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	400
Max RAM Capacity	—	2
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1 Micro-6200T) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735.