E1 Micro-6200T
Pentium M 750
E1 Micro-6200T vs Pentium M 750 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
E1 Micro-6200T vs Pentium M 750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
E1 Micro-6200T vs Pentium M 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
E1 Micro-6200T
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 27W, a 23W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 485).
Pentium M 750
2005Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌575% higher power demand at 27W vs 4W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium M 750 better than E1 Micro-6200T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
E1 Micro-6200T vs Pentium M 750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
E1 Micro-6200T
The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.
Pentium M 750
The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The E1 Micro-6200T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 750 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 — a 28.2% clock advantage for the Pentium M 750 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The E1 Micro-6200T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium M 750 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the E1 Micro-6200T scores 475 against the Pentium M 750's 485 — a 2.1% lead for the Pentium M 750.
| Feature | E1 Micro-6200T | Pentium M 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 1.86 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 1.86 GHz+86% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 28 nm-69% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Mullins (2014) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| PassMark | 475 | 485+2% |
Memory & Platform
The E1 Micro-6200T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | E1 Micro-6200T | Pentium M 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on E1 Micro-6200T and Pentium M 750
