E1 Micro-6200T
VS
Pentium M 750

E1 Micro-6200T vs Pentium M 750

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Pentium M 750

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1 Micro-6200T is positioned at rank 1091 and the Pentium M 750 is on rank 131, so the Pentium M 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1 Micro-6200T

#1079
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1080
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1081
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1082
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1083
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1085
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1086
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1087
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1088
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
E1 Micro-6200T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 750

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
95%
#119
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
302%
#120
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
298%
#121
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
274%
#122
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
272%
#123
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
270%
#125
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
261%
#126
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
250%
#127
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
249%
#128
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
243%
#131
Pentium M 750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
98%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1 Micro-6200T (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE1 Micro-6200TPentium M 750
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium M 750 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE1 Micro-6200TPentium M 750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1 Micro-6200T and Pentium M 750

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium M 750

The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The E1 Micro-6200T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 750 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 — a 28.2% clock advantage for the Pentium M 750 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The E1 Micro-6200T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium M 750 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the E1 Micro-6200T scores 475 against the Pentium M 750's 485 — a 2.1% lead for the Pentium M 750.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TPentium M 750
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
1.86 GHz+33%
Base Clock
1 GHz
1.86 GHz+86%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
2 MB+100%
Process
28 nm-69%
90 nm
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
475
485+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1 Micro-6200T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TPentium M 750
Socket
FT3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1