Celeron 570
VS
E1 Micro-6200T

Celeron 570 vs E1 Micro-6200T

VS
AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 570 is positioned at rank 1230 and the E1 Micro-6200T is on rank 1091, so the E1 Micro-6200T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 570

#1218
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7782%
#1219
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7668%
#1220
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
7040%
#1221
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
7008%
#1222
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6944%
#1224
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6706%
#1225
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
6430%
#1226
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
6419%
#1227
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
6247%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1231
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
88%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
75%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
63%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
57%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
55%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
54%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
49%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
45%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1 Micro-6200T

#1079
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1080
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1081
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1082
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1083
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1085
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1086
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1087
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1088
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
E1 Micro-6200T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1 Micro-6200T (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 570E1 Micro-6200T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 570 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 570E1 Micro-6200T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 570 and E1 Micro-6200T

Intel

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The E1 Micro-6200T is built on the Mullins (2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the E1 Micro-6200T's 475 — a 6.1% lead for the Celeron 570.

FeatureCeleron 570E1 Micro-6200T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.26 GHz+126%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1024 kB
Process
65 nm
28 nm-57%
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
PassMark
505+6%
475
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 570 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E1 Micro-6200T uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 570E1 Micro-6200T
Socket
PGA478
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 570) / not specified (E1 Micro-6200T). Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.

FeatureCeleron 570E1 Micro-6200T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget