Celeron 440
VS
E1 Micro-6200T

Celeron 440 vs E1 Micro-6200T

Intel

Celeron 440

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
VS
AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 440 is positioned at rank 1031 and the E1 Micro-6200T is on rank 1091, so the Celeron 440 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 440

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
38964%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
36818%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
26733%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8053%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6379%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5581%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3196%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3155%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2872%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2872%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2840%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2763%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2725%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2714%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2689%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
96%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
100%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
97%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
97%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
95%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
95%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
95%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
95%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
94%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
94%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
93%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
91%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
91%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1 Micro-6200T

#1079
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1080
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1081
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1082
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1083
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1085
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1086
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1087
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1088
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
E1 Micro-6200T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1 Micro-6200T (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 440E1 Micro-6200T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 440 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 440E1 Micro-6200T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 440 and E1 Micro-6200T

Intel

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron 440 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the E1 Micro-6200T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 versus 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Celeron 440 (base: 2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Celeron 440 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the E1 Micro-6200T uses Mullins (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 440 scores 472 against the E1 Micro-6200T's 475 — a 0.6% lead for the E1 Micro-6200T.

FeatureCeleron 440E1 Micro-6200T
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz+43%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+100%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1024 kB+100%
Process
65 nm
28 nm-57%
Architecture
Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Mullins (2014)
PassMark
472
475
Geekbench 6 Single
244
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 440 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1 Micro-6200T uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 440E1 Micro-6200T
Socket
LGA775
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 440) / not specified (E1 Micro-6200T). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureCeleron 440E1 Micro-6200T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget