Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 750

Intel

Celeron 440

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 750

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 750 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 440

2007

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (472 vs 485).
    • Launch MSRP is still $59 MSRP, while Pentium M 750 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 29.6% higher power demand at 35W vs 27W.

    Pentium M 750

    2005

    Why buy it

    • +2.8% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 27W instead of 35W, a 8W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron 440 better than Pentium M 750?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 440 is ahead with 7.5% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 750 pulls ahead with 2.8% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron 440 is the better buy right now. Celeron 440 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $59 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 7.5% higher max boost clock. The compromise is that Pentium M 750 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron 440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 750 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron 440

    The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

    Intel

    Pentium M 750

    The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Celeron 440 and Pentium M 750 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Celeron 440 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Celeron 440 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium M 750 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 440 scores 472 against the Pentium M 750's 485 — a 2.7% lead for the Pentium M 750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureCeleron 440Pentium M 750
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz+8%
    1.86 GHz
    Base Clock
    2 GHz+8%
    1.86 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    2 MB+300%
    Process
    65 nm-28%
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Conroe-L (2007−2008)
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    PassMark
    472
    485+3%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    244
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron 440 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron 440Pentium M 750
    Socket
    LGA775
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: No (Celeron 440) / not specified (Pentium M 750). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

    FeatureCeleron 440Pentium M 750
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    No
    Target Use
    Budget