Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3500+

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3500+ Performance Spectrum

Celeron 440

1 / 1

472

+1.5%

465

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3500+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3500+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 440

2007

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 62W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $59 MSRP, while Sempron 3500+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 3500+

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (465 vs 472).
❌77.1% higher power demand at 62W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 440 better than Sempron 3500+?

Yes. Celeron 440 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.5% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 440 is the better buy right now. Celeron 440 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $59 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3500+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

Sempron 3500+

The Sempron 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $167.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 440 and Sempron 3500+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3500+ — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron 440 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3500+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 440 scores 472 against the Sempron 3500+'s 465 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 440. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 440	Sempron 3500+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark	472+2%	465
Geekbench 6 Single	244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 440 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3500+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 440	Sempron 3500+
Socket	LGA775	939
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 440) / not specified (Sempron 3500+). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.