Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3600+

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3600+ Performance Spectrum

Celeron 440

1 / 1

472

0.0%

485

+2.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3600+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3600+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 440

2007

Why buy it

✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $105 MSRP).
✅Delivers 73.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($59 MSRP vs $105 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 62W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (472 vs 485).

Sempron 3600+

2006

Why buy it

✅+2.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($105 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌77.1% higher power demand at 62W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 3600+ better than Celeron 440?

Yes. Sempron 3600+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3600+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 3600+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 3600+ comes in 78.0% more expensive on MSRP at $105 MSRP versus $59 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.8% higher PassMark. Celeron 440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 73.2% better value on paper (8.0 vs 4.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 3600+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

Sempron 3600+

The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 440 and Sempron 3600+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3600+ — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron 440 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3600+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 440 scores 472 against the Sempron 3600+'s 485 — a 2.7% lead for the Sempron 3600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 440	Sempron 3600+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Manila (2001−2006)
PassMark	472	485+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 440 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 440) vs 1 (Sempron 3600+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron 440	Sempron 3600+
Socket	LGA775	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 440) vs None (Sempron 3600+). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget, Sempron 3600+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Celeron 440	Sempron 3600+
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	None
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 440 was priced at $59, while the Sempron 3600+ came in at $105. On launch pricing ($59 vs $105), Celeron 440 was $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 440 delivers 8.0 pts/$ vs 4.6 pts/$ for the Sempron 3600+ — making the Celeron 440 the 53.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 440	Sempron 3600+
MSRP	$59-44%	$105
Performance per Dollar	8.0+74%	4.6
Release Date	2007	2006

Search Celeron 440 on Amazon

Search Sempron 3600+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.