Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 745

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 745 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 440

2007

Why buy it

✅+144% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $59 MSRP, while Pentium M 745 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 21W.

Pentium M 745

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 35W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (100 vs 244).
❌Lower PassMark (465 vs 472).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 440 better than Pentium M 745?

Yes. Celeron 440 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.5% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 440 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 144% stronger Geekbench single-core performance.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 440 is the better buy right now. Celeron 440 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $59 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 440 vs Pentium M 745 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

Pentium M 745

The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 440 and Pentium M 745 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Celeron 440 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron 440 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium M 745 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 440 scores 472 against the Pentium M 745's 465 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 440. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 244 vs 100, a 83.7% lead for the Celeron 440 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 440	Pentium M 745
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	472+2%	465
Geekbench 6 Single	244+144%	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 440 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 745 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron 440 versus DDR2 on the Pentium M 745 — the Celeron 440 supports 39900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 440 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 440) vs 1 (Pentium M 745). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 945,G31,G41 (Celeron 440) and Intel 855GME,Intel 855PM (Pentium M 745).

Feature	Celeron 440	Pentium M 745
Socket	LGA775	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+39900%	DDR2
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: No (Celeron 440) vs false (Pentium M 745). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.