Celeron 440 vs Sempron 130

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 130 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 440

1 / 1

472

0.0%

488

+3.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 440

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (472 vs 488).
❌Launch MSRP is still $59 MSRP, while Sempron 130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 130

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 130 better than Celeron 440?

Yes. Sempron 130 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.4% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 130 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 30% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 130 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $59 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.4% higher PassMark. Celeron 440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 130 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 440 vs Sempron 130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

Sempron 130

The Sempron 130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 488 points. Launch price was $25.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 440 and Sempron 130 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 versus 2.6 GHz on the Sempron 130 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Sempron 130 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron 440 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 130 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 440 scores 472 against the Sempron 130's 488 — a 3.3% lead for the Sempron 130. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 440	Sempron 130
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	472	488+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 440 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 130 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 440	Sempron 130
Socket	LGA775	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 440) / not specified (Sempron 130). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.